This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Slip and Fall

Laren Joel Jackson v. 99 Cents Only Store

Published: Jan. 25, 2014 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: YC065617 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mary Etta C. Marks


Defendant

Michael M. Hernandez

John R. DaCorsi


Experts

Plaintiff

Zong Lang Tsai
(medical)

Defendant

Edwin C. Amos M.D.
(medical)

Agnes M. Grogan R.N.
(technical)

Facts

On Sept. 20, 2009, Laren Jackson went to a 99 Cents Only Store in Hawthorne. While walking into one of the store's aisles, he slipped and fell. He filed suit against the store.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged premises liability because defendant did not correctly maintain the store to be safe for customers. He alleged that there was water on the floor that was coming from two buckets that were catching water from a drip in the ceiling.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended it had a policy of conducting formal inspections on an hourly basis. Defendant argued that plaintiff's rendition of the incident (i.e. buckets to catch mist) was not plausible. Defendant claimed there was no water on the floor and had not received an actual or constructive notice of any dangerous condition.

Defendant also argued that plaintiff had sustained minor injuries, if any. Defendant claimed plaintiff suffered from pre-existing injuries (seizures from a previous head wound) and was non-compliant with his seizure medication following the incident, which resulted in an emergency room visit. Defendant argued plaintiff failed to mitigate damages. Defendant argued that nothing was obstructing plaintiff's view when he was walking down the aisle.

During trial, plaintiff testified that subsequent to the incident he had been a passenger in a vehicle traveling at approximately 70 mph on the freeway. With the exception of seizures, his personal injury claims were the same.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $1 million and the defense made no offer.

Injuries

Jackson suffered back and head injuries, which brought about seizures. He also suffered injuries to his right shoulder, and eyes, and experienced head dizziness, body weakness, frequent forgetfulness, severe pain that requires that medication be taken, and sense of loss.

Result

The jury found in favor of the defense.

Other Information

Plaintiff has appealed.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

11-1

Length

six days


#100295

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390