This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Taxation
Intentional Interference with Economic Advantage
Corporate Taxation; Tax Refund

Gene Yamagata, Rex Maughan and Ruth Maughan v. United States

Published: Feb. 1, 2014 | Result Date: Jan. 6, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 07-698T; 07-704T Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

U.S. Court of Federal Claims


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tim A. Tarter

Merwin D. Grant


Defendant

Kathryn Keneally

Jason Bergmann

David Pincus


Facts

Gene Yamagata, Rex Maughan and Ruth Maughan filed a complaint against United States, seeking tax refund.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Rex and Ruth Maughan, husband and wife, and Gene Yamagata were both 50 percent stockholders of Forever Living Products Japan. Each treated Forever Living Products as a corporation when they initially filed their tax returns for tax years 1991 through 1996. They filed this lawsuit against the U.S., claiming that the agreements they entered into during the early 1990s transformed Forever Living Products into a partnership, making their original filings as a corporation an error. Consequently, they alleged that they were entitled to a significant adjustment in taxes. Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The government filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, arguing that Forever Living Products was correctly taxed as a corporation.

Damages

Yamagata sought $9,753,274 in tax refund plus costs, fees, and interest. The Maughans sought $36,738,362 in tax refund plus costs and interest.

Result

U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Nancy B. Firestone concluded that Forever Living Products exhibited at least three of the attributes of a corporation during the relevant time periods. As such, Forever Living Products closely resembled a corporation, and was properly taxed as a corporation. The court granted the government's motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment.


#100341

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390