This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Fair Labor Standards Act
Wage and Hour

Kelly Butler v. HomeServices Lending, LLC

Published: Feb. 8, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 9, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:11-cv-02313-L(MDD) Verdict –  $48,901

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory M. Garrison
(Teeple Hall LLP)

Grant G. Teeple
(Teeple Hall LLP)


Defendant

Thomas R. Kaufman
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)

Paul Berkowitz
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Kelly Butler sued her former employer HomeServices Lending LLC, for failure to pay overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that she was informed that her job with HomeServices would be in jeopardy if she continued to report the overtime she was working. Thereafter, plaintiff worked an average of 60 hours a week of which 20 hours were off the clock and went unpaid. Plaintiff alleged that HomeServices' management knew or should have known that she was working overtime without pay.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
HomeServices contended that plaintiff had been instructed to input her time accurately into the timekeeping system and that she should seek permission before working overtime. HomeServices contended that plaintiff had no valid excuse for failing to seek permission to work overtime and failing to accurately report her time. HomeServices also contended that plaintiff's manager was unaware that she had worked overtime and that she did not record it in the timekeeping system because he worked more than 50 miles away from plaintiff and timekeeping was processed by a third party.

Result

The jury found that HomeServices willfully violated the FLSA. The parties then stipulated that plaintiff is entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $48,900.75 for a total judgment of $95,802 under 29 U.S.C. Section 260, if the defense motion for equitable estoppel is denied.

Other Information

The defense filed a post-trial motion for equitable estoppel, which is pending. After judgment is entered plaintiff will move for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Section 216(b). FILING DATE: June 7, 2011.

Deliberation

seven hours

Length

four days


#100374

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390