This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Rear-End Collision

Joshua Hoye v. Michael Lee

Published: Jun. 3, 2006 | Result Date: Feb. 2, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SV250716 Verdict –  $2,743

Court

San Joaquin Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David B. Walker


Defendant

Shafeeq Sadiq
(Sadiq Law Firm)


Facts

In 2004, Plaintiff Joshua Hoye was driving on Highway 99 preparing to exit. He came to a stop at the end of the off ramp and was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Defendant Michael Lee. Hoye sued Lee, alleging negligence.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the defendant struck him because he was not paying attention while driving. In addition, the plaintiff contended that the defendant was driving over the speed limit at approximately 40 to 45 mph. The plaintiff's counsel explained that the plaintiff did not seek medical treatment until 26 days after the accident because he was initially trying to avoid treatment, but eventually decided to seek it because of the pain.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant conceded liability, but claimed that because his vehicle sustained no damage in the accident and the plaintiff's vehicle sustained little damage, he could not have been going as fast as the plaintiff contended. Concerning the plaintiff's injuries, the defense contended that the impact of the accident was not strong enough to have caused the plaintiff's neck injuries. The defense supported this contention by pointing out that the plaintiff decided to seek medical treatment 26 days after the accident occurred. Further, months before this accident, the plaintiff hit a utility pole head-on going 45 mph, but suffered no injuries.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $4,800 and the defendant offered $1,001.

Damages

The plaintiff requested $5,000 in damages. This amount included medical costs.

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed soft-tissue injuries to his neck. He sought chiropractic treatment.

Result

$2,743 for medical costs.

Deliberation

2.5 hours

Poll

12-0

Length

two days


#100603

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390