This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Rear-End Collision

Selene Ballonoff v. Ana McGlothlin, Eugene McGlothlin

Published: Jul. 2, 2011 | Result Date: Apr. 14, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BG07320280 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Charles R. Roe
(Samuelson, Wilson & Roe)


Defendant

Michael J. Smith
(Carbone, Smoke, Smith, Bent & Leonard)


Experts

Plaintiff

Tracy A. Newkirk
(medical)

Defendant

Steven McIntire M.D., Ph.D.
(medical)

Maud Nerman
(medical)

Facts

Selene Ballonoff was stopped at an intersection when she was rear-ended by a vehicle operated by Eugene McGlothlin. The force of the impact caused Ballonoff's car to propel half a block forward. She sued McGlothlin and his mother, Ana McGlothlin, the owner of the vehicle, for negligent operation of the vehicle and vicarious liability. Defendants alleged that Ballonoff acted negligently and was the sole cause of the accident since she stopped abruptly at the intersection, causing the accident.

Damages

Ballonoff sought $29,134 in past medical costs, and the same amount for future medical costs. She also sought unspecified amount for pain and suffering.

Injuries

Ballonoff claimed to have sustained a concussion with postconcussion syndrome. She was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury in 2006, and claimed that the accident exacerbated her preexisting conditions, which included: tempromandibular joint disorder; thoracic outlet syndrome; headaches; skin prickling; fatigue; and strains and sprains to her neck, back, hips, knees, right calf, pubis, and chest. She also claimed to have an adverse reaction to a chemical that was used during an MRI. She did not undergo any surgery to treat her injuries, but have been receiving ongoing physical therapy. Defendants contended that Ballonoff did not sustain any serious injury from the accident, and denied her claim of a traumatic brain injury. They claimed that plaintiff only sustained strains and sprains that have since resolved.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defense.

Deliberation

one hour

Length

four days


#100719

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390