This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Unfair Business Competition

Brighton Collectibles Inc. v. Coldwater Creek Inc.

Published: Feb. 14, 2009 | Result Date: Nov. 21, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 06CV01848(MLH) Verdict –  $6,717,000

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary A. Freedman

Peter W. Ross
(Ross LLP)

Marta Beth Almli

Keith J. Wesley
(Ellis George Cipollone O'Brien Annaguey LLP)

Steven W. Winton


Defendant

Stacy O. Stitham

Edward J. Mcintyre

Peter J. Brann

Alison L. Pivonka


Experts

Plaintiff

Carol Scott
(technical)

Robert W. Wunderlich
(technical)

Defendant

Ellen Goldstein-Lynch
(technical)

Philip Johnson
(technical)

Facts

Brighton Collectibles Inc. designed handbags as well as other products, and sold them under the trademark "Brighton." In addition, Brighton claimed that its products had a distinctive look, commonly known as "Brighton Look." Brighton also owned copyrights to the "Carolina Heart" and "Brighton Scroll" designs, which are used on handbags and related women's accessories. It claimed that Coldwater Creek Inc. intentionally designed, marketed and sold Brighton knockoff bags, called the "Jacquard Line." Brighton sued Coldwater Creek for copyright infringement, trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and statutory unfair competition.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Brighton claimed that Coldwater Creek intentionally designed, marketed and sold handbags and related accessories that infringed upon Brighton's distinctive trade dress and copyrighted designs. Brighton asserted that consumers were likely to be confused as to the source of Coldwater Creek's accessories. Brighton contended that an expert conducted a survey showing that 85 percent of customers believed that Coldwater Creek handbags were made by Brighton. Brighton claimed that Coldwater Creek's infringement resulted in lost sales and damages to Brighton's goodwill.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Coldwater Creek argued that Brighton's products did not contain the claimed trade dress, the designs were common within the industry, and only three percent of consumers confused Coldwater Creek's products with those of Brighton.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed between $5,000,000 and $12,000,000 in damages.

Result

The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,717,000 in damages, finding intentional infringement and unfair competition with malice, fraud and/or oppression, plus $1,235,404 in attorneys' fees and a permanent injunction.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Sept. 12, 2006.

Length

seven days


#100990

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390