This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Redevelopment
California Environmental Quality Act

Montgomery-Washington Homeowners Association; Neighbors for Preservation, Land Use, And Community Education (PLACE) v. San Francisco Community College District

Published: Feb. 14, 2009 | Result Date: Dec. 10, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CP-07-507854 Settlement –  Dismissal of CEQA challenge for $75,000

Facts

In 2007, San Francisco Community College (SFCC) publicly announced its intent to construct a new Chinatown, North Beach campus. As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), SFCC filed an environmental impact report (EIR).

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Claiming that SFCC's project would harm the community, Neighbors for Preservation, Land Use, and Community Education (PLACE) and Montgomery-Washington Homeowners Association (MWHA) challenged the project. They sued SFCC based on the CEQA.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense asserted that SFCC's EIR complied with CEQA and that the plaintiffs' claims would hinder the college's development.

Result

The project was allowed to proceed as approved and plaintiff was reimbursed for $75,000 in fees plus costs.


#101005

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390