This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Breach of Contract
Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Craig Milhouse, Pamela Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance Company

Published: Jan. 11, 2014 | Result Date: Nov. 5, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SACV-10-1730-CJC(ANx) Bench Decision –  $1,076,630

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Edward P. Murphy

Jennifer N. Wahlgren

Marjie D. Barrows

Matthew S. Ponzi

G. Edward Rudloff Jr.


Defendant

Julia A. Mouser

Anthony L. Cannon
(Cannon & Nelms PC)

Robert W. Nelms

Debra K. Cook
(Office of the Riverside County City Attorney)


Facts

Craig Milhouse and Pamela Milhouse owned a home in Yorba Linda. In 2008, the Yorba Linda Freeway Complex fire destroyed their home. The house and all of their personal property within was lost. The Milhouses then tendered a claim to Travelers Commercial Insurance Co. on their homeowner's insurance policy, but Travelers disputed their claim. The Milhouses then sued, alleging breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

After a trial, a jury awarded the Milhouses $1,949,634 in damages on their breach of contract claim. The jury found no bad faith and awarded no extracontractual damages, and further found no basis for any award of punitive damages..

Both sides then filed post-trial motions, disputing various parts of the judgment. Travelers moved for judgment as a matter of law, or sought a new trial on the Milhouse's contract claim.

The Milhouses moved for a new trial on their breach of good faith claims.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The Milhouses argued that Travelers had acted in bad faith, and that errors during the trial had prejudiced them on the issue.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Travelers argued that the jury's verdict had not been reasonable, and because it had not been in breach of contract. They also argued that the Milhouses could not establish that Travelers was in breach of any dwelling, alternative living, or loss of use coverage obligations.

Result

The court sided with the Millhouses, granting its post-trial motion for remittitur, or a new trial. The court found that the jury's damage award was excessive, and remitted it to $1,076,634. The Millhouses chose to accept the remittitur on the breach of contract claim. The court also denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial on bad faith and punitive damages.

Other Information

The Milhouses' final post trial motion, to augment the judgment, is currently scheduled to be heard on January 6th when the final amount of judgment will be determined. Both parties have filed notices of intent to appeal.


#101192

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390