Tisha Vogt v. Zack Stockwell, James Mechem Contruction Company and DNA Construction Company
Published: Jul. 28, 2007 | Result Date: Apr. 18, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CV 153220 Verdict – Defense
Court
Santa Cruz Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Glenn MacWhonten
(medical)
Paul Ware
(medical)
Nicholas Abidi
(medical)
G. Michael Graham
(technical)
Thaddeus J. Whalen Jr.
(technical)
Randall B. Aiman-Smith
(Aiman-Smith & Marcy PC)
(technical)
Defendant
George McLaughlin
(technical)
Stephen Plager
(medical)
John Christianson
(medical)
Lawrence J. Deneen J.D.
(technical)
Paul J. Mills
(medical)
Steven D. Feinberg
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff, Tisha Vogt, returned home one night when her dog bolted out of her car and ran into a construction lot adjacent to her home. She did not know she was about to fall into a hole as she gave chase to the dog onto the lot. The plaintiff sued various parties including James Mechem Construction Co. for negligent maintenance of the premises.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff argued there was insufficient caution tape to notify pedestrians of a dangerous condition on the lot and that there was poor lighting, as she could not see where she was going.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant argued the condition at the site was open and obvious and that the contractors had strategically placed yellow caution tape to warn of heightened danger. The defendant further presented evidence that plaintiff was injured because she was intoxicated, as evidenced by testimony that she arrived at the hospital in a drunken state. The plaintiff countered that she was not drunk before the accident, and only had a drink before she went to the hospital. Further, the plaintiff countered that any tape strategically placed at the site, was posted after her accident.
Specials in Evidence
The plaintiff sought to recover $100,000 in past and future medical bills. The plaintiff also sought $900,000 in past and future wage losses.
Damages
The plaintiff sought unspecified damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Injuries
The plaintiff was treated in the emergency room, where she was diagnosed with a sprained ankle, which she argued developed into complex regional pain syndrome.
Result
The jury found defendants were not liable for negligent maintenance of the construction site and that the dangerous condition was open and obvious.
Deliberation
six hours
Poll
9-3
Length
eight days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390