This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Negligence
Horse Incident

Nancy Skarvan-Ince, Jeffe Ince v. Denise Morgenroth

Published: Dec. 16, 2003 | Result Date: Jul. 25, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 22074 Verdict –  $264,682

Judge

Garett Olney

Court

Plumas Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John M. O'Brien
(O'Brien & Zehnder Law Firm)


Defendant

Kelly L. Lynch


Experts

Plaintiff

Anthony Zizzimos
(medical)

Larry Townsend
(technical)

Frank Merrill
(medical)

Defendant

Michelle Lindley
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff, Nancy Skarvan-Ince, a 43-year-old farrier's assistant, and defendant Denise Morgenroth were friends. On Oct. 19, 1999, the defendant telephoned and asked the plaintiff and her husband to help her worm and vaccinate the horses on her ranch in Portola. The plaintiffs (husband and wife) arrived with a veterinarian and together with the defendant put together a plan to complete the job. As they were considering how they should proceed, the plaintiff husband asked the defendant whether they should anticipate any problems with the two yearlings. The defendant responded that her ex-husband had been working with the horses and that they were "halter broken." Acting upon this, the plaintiff wife haltered and led about six of the older horses to the veterinarian for vaccinations. After she had slipped the halter on the first yearling, the horse went wild and reared up. In the split second that followed, the plaintiff wife reacted and attempted to pull the horse sideways to get it off balance. She did not succeed. Instead, the horse reared up even further and leapt in the air, taking the plaintiff with him. She landed sideways on her right knee. The plaintiff wife sued the defendant and argued negligence. The plaintiff husband sued for loss of consortium. They claimed that, contrary to what they had been told, the horse was never properly halter-broken. The case was defended on the theory of assumption of risk.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs demanded $125,000; the defendant offered $20,000.

Injuries

The plaintiff wife claimed anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament tears of the right knee, requiring two reconstructive surgeries. Two future knee replacement surgeries are also possible.

Result

The jury found for the plaintiffs and awarded $264,682 gross (including $15,000 for loss of consortium). This was reduced on a finding of 40 percent comparative fault to $164,809 net.

Deliberation

four hours

Poll

9-3

Length

four days


#101315

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390