This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Automobile Accident
Negligence

Mehrdad Z. Shirazi; Elaine Shirazi v. John F. Duignan; Arleen A. Duignan

Published: Apr. 5, 1997 | Result Date: Nov. 26, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 952159397 –  $0

Judge

James C. Kaiser

Court

King Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey Tuttle

Bradford Fulton


Defendant

Craig Evezich


Experts

Plaintiff

Gary F. Schuster
(medical)

Facts

On Aug. 31, 1994, plaintiff Mitch Shirazi, a 37-year-old engineer, was driving a 1974 Volkswagen Beetle when he attempted to exit for a McDonald's restaurant on SR 515. As he approached the exit drive, a courtesy gap was provided by other motorists traveling in the northbound lanes of SR 515 (traffic was congested at the time due to early rush-hour traffic). Acknowledging the courtesy gap left by the northbound motorists, Shirazi began traversing the northbound lanes. Prior to reaching the center two-way turn lane, Shirazi stopped and checked left and right for motorists entering the center-turn lane. Seeing none, he entered the center-turn lane. At approximately the same time, defendant Arleen Duignan, who was traveling northbound on SR 515, moved from the inside northbound lane into the center-turn lane. Defendant Duignan's purpose in moving into the center-turn lane was to access the "left turn only" lanes located to the north. Ultimately, both motorist entered the center-turn lane and a collision resulted. The plaintiffs brought this action the defendant based on negligence and loss of consortium theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a settlement demand for $20,000-$22,000. The defendant made a settlement offer of compromise for $10,000.

Specials in Evidence

$3,290 $617.28 $1,122.80 $6,650

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged that he suffered soft-tissue injuries to the neck and back and a neck sprain. The plaintiff also claimed to have suffered a forehead contusion, pinched nerve and a possible cervical radiculopathy. The plaintiff alleged miled anterior disc protrusion at C4-5 and a mild diffuse posterior disc protrusion at C5-7, left shoulder impingement syndrome with chronic bursitis, post traumatic left shoulder arthritis, and a C7 radiculopathy.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years after the case was filed. An arbitration was held before Gene Grantham resulting in a $25,000 award. The defendant requested a trial de novo.

Deliberation

2+ hours

Poll

10-2

Length

4 days


#101429

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390