This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement
Lanham Act, Tariff Act

Coach Inc., a Maryland corporation; Coach Services Inc., a Maryland corporation v. Celco Customs Service Company, a California corporation; Shen Huei Feng Wang, aka Celine Wang, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: May 4, 2013 | Result Date: Mar. 28, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:2011-cv-10787-MMM-PJW Verdict –  $8,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Samuel R. Watkins

Walter Peña


Defendant

Susan K. Ross
(Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp LLP)

Shun C. Chen
(Law Offices of Shun C. Chen)


Facts

Coach Inc. launched an investigation after the U.S. Customs and Border Protection advised Coach that it had seized a large shipment of Coach handbags and wallets headed for the Port of Los Angeles. Coach discovered that a Customs brokerage firm had created and filed fraudulent customs entry documents to allow the counterfeit products to be shipped into the country. Most importers hire customs brokerage firms to handle the paperwork required for the importation of goods.

Coach sued Celco Customs Service Co., Shen Wang and others, alleging violations of the Lanham Act, Tariff Act, Unfair Competition Laws, and trademark infringement.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that defendants, in the course of providing Customs brokerage services to the importers of these counterfeit goods, knowingly and willfully filed fraudulent entry papers with Customs to permit the importation of the counterfeit goods.

Plaintiffs contended that this action rendered defendants contributorily liable for trademark infringement.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied having any knowledge of the counterfeit nature of the goods.

Result

The jury awarded Coach $8 million in the counterfeiting case.

Deliberation

half day

Length

three days


#101572

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390