Robert Herskowitz, Phoebe Juel v. Apple Inc.
Published: May 4, 2013 | Result Date: Apr. 15, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 5:12-cv-2131 Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Joseph J. Tabacco Jr.
(Berman Tabacco)
Christopher T. Heffelfinger
(Berman Tabacco)
Defendant
Tiffany Cheung
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Penelope A. Preovolos
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Facts
Phoebe Juel filed a class action against Apple, representing a class of consumers who made repeated downloads of the same song from iTunes and discovered that Apple charged them every time. Robert Herskowitz claimed that Apple double-billed him for a single download, but Apple denied him a refund based on its purported no refund policy. They alleged breach of contract, bad faith, violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, fraud, and unjust enrichment.
Apple moved to dismiss, arguing that Apple had no legal obligation to provide consumers with a second download of the same song free of charge.
Result
The judge dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, ruling that Apple clearly disclosed that multiple charges accompany multiple downloads of the same song. The Court dismissed plaintiffs' claims with leave to amend, except as to the claim for unjust enrichment, which was dismissed with prejudice.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390