Lois Allen, individually, and as Conservator to John Allen v. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Barton Wachs M.D., Michael G. Alexander M.D., and Does 1 through 20
Published: Mar. 1, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 12, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: NC053971 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Long Beach
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jeffrey C. Bogert
(Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Bogert)
Defendant
Harmon B. Levine
(Dummit, Buchholz & Trapp )
Robert L. McKenna III
(Kjar, McKenna & Stockalper LLP)
Sidney J. Martin
(Schmid & Voiles)
Experts
Plaintiff
Steven Mittleman
(medical)
Defendant
Selvyn Bleifer
(medical)
Connie Miranda
(medical)
Edwin C. Amos M.D.
(medical)
Facts
On Jan. 14, 2009, John Allen went to see urologist Dr. Barton Wachs. Allen had been experiencing active bleeding in his urinary tract for the past few days, and Wachs recommended surgery. Wachs performed the surgery.
Plaintiff Lois Allen, John's wife, sued Wachs, Long Beach Memorial, and Dr. Michael Alexander, the anesthesiologist for the surgery. Dr. Wachs settled with the plaintiffs, and the case proceeded against the other defendants. Dr. Alexander was also later dismissed from the case.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that sometime after the surgery, but related to the surgery, caused Allen to suffer a stroke. As a result of the stroke, Allen later suffered from dementia.
She claimed that during the surgery, the defendants incorrectly administered anesthesia to her husband, ultimately causing his stroke. She argued that Dr. Alexander mistakenly administered general anesthesia, when he should have administered it otherwise.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Long Beach argued that the surgery had been successful, and that Allen had not suffered a stroke during the procedure. There were no records that indicated that there were any complications during the surgery that suggested Allen had suffered a stroke, and that everything had gone according to plan.
They also argued that Allen's symptoms and dementia were symptoms of Alzheimer's, which had nothing to do with the surgery. Furthermore, the standard of care did not require the hospital to obtain a pre-operative clearance by an internal medicine specialist. This would be up to the patient's physician, not the hospital.
Damages
Plaintiffs requested $250,000 in damages.
Result
The jury ruled in favor of defense, finding no negligence.
Deliberation
one hour
Poll
12-0
Length
eight days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390