This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Negligent Treatment

Lois Allen, individually, and as Conservator to John Allen v. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Barton Wachs M.D., Michael G. Alexander M.D., and Does 1 through 20

Published: Mar. 1, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 12, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: NC053971 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Long Beach


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey C. Bogert
(Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Bogert)


Defendant

Harmon B. Levine
(Dummit, Buchholz & Trapp )

Robert L. McKenna III
(Kjar, McKenna & Stockalper LLP)

Sidney J. Martin
(Schmid & Voiles)


Experts

Plaintiff

Steven Mittleman
(medical)

Defendant

Selvyn Bleifer
(medical)

Connie Miranda
(medical)

Edwin C. Amos M.D.
(medical)

Facts

On Jan. 14, 2009, John Allen went to see urologist Dr. Barton Wachs. Allen had been experiencing active bleeding in his urinary tract for the past few days, and Wachs recommended surgery. Wachs performed the surgery.

Plaintiff Lois Allen, John's wife, sued Wachs, Long Beach Memorial, and Dr. Michael Alexander, the anesthesiologist for the surgery. Dr. Wachs settled with the plaintiffs, and the case proceeded against the other defendants. Dr. Alexander was also later dismissed from the case.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that sometime after the surgery, but related to the surgery, caused Allen to suffer a stroke. As a result of the stroke, Allen later suffered from dementia.

She claimed that during the surgery, the defendants incorrectly administered anesthesia to her husband, ultimately causing his stroke. She argued that Dr. Alexander mistakenly administered general anesthesia, when he should have administered it otherwise.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Long Beach argued that the surgery had been successful, and that Allen had not suffered a stroke during the procedure. There were no records that indicated that there were any complications during the surgery that suggested Allen had suffered a stroke, and that everything had gone according to plan.

They also argued that Allen's symptoms and dementia were symptoms of Alzheimer's, which had nothing to do with the surgery. Furthermore, the standard of care did not require the hospital to obtain a pre-operative clearance by an internal medicine specialist. This would be up to the patient's physician, not the hospital.

Damages

Plaintiffs requested $250,000 in damages.

Result

The jury ruled in favor of defense, finding no negligence.

Deliberation

one hour

Poll

12-0

Length

eight days


#101758

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390