This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Real Estate Purchase
Road Improvement

Tejon Real Estate v. City of Los Angeles

Published: Sep. 6, 2008 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC356284 Settlement –  Equitable Award

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David M. Leeper


Defendant

Rockard J. Delgadillo

Laurie Rittenberg

Melody B. Bormaster


Facts

Plaintiff Tejon Real Estate LLC owned property at 4413 Harriman Avenue in Los Angeles, an area known as a "paper street." The access to Harriman from Collis Avenue was Burr Street. Collis Avenue was paved, with curbs and gutters, but Burr Street was not. Burr Street was used to access two garages on either side of the street. Defendant city of Los Angeles put a gate on Burr Street to prevent damage from weed abatement and plowing. Plaintiff sued defendant in equity.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended it wished to develop the lot with a single-family residence, which required a paved road to the lot. Defendant failed to require improvement on Burr Street while allowing the garages to front the street. Plaintiff claimed a $15,000 fee for a $100,000 project was unreasonable and sought a declaration that it only needed to improve Harriman Avenue or defendant must pay for and maintain Burr Street.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended the builder of the houses with garages on Burr Street never paved or improved the street. Plaintiff was responsible for removing the old pavement on the portion of Burr between Harriman and Collis as well as repaving the street. Further, defendant could determine the estimated cost of the street and set the proper bond amount. If the estimated cost was $100,000, the city inspector's fee was $15,000.

Result

The parties agreed to an equitable award in the form of a building permit without building a road over the old road.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 31, 2006.


#101844

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390