This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Trespass, Negligence, Fraud or Deceit, Conspiracy

Brea Imperial Inc. v. Automotive Wheels Inc.

Published: Aug. 30, 2008 | Result Date: Oct. 30, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 05CC06828 Verdict –  $3,996,770

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert S. Coldren

Christopher R. Elliott


Defendant

William E. Manning

Brent F. Basilico


Facts

Brea Imperial Inc., is the owner of a 356,000 square foot warehouse/manufacturing facility on approximately 16.87 acres located in Brea. Brea Imperial sought monetary damages from Automotive Wheels, Inc. as a result of AWI's alleged failure to timely and properly remove large industrial equipment from the property and alleged related fraudulent conduct.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
CRC Rim Inc. operated a wheel manufacturing operation at the property with machinery and equipment supplied by AWI. CRC, however, filed for bankruptcy protection on Dec. 23, 2003. Brea Imperial acquired the property on March 11, 2004. Brea Imperial and AWI entered into an agreement, which allowed AWI to store, market and remove the Equipment in exchange for the payment of a reduced rental/storage fee.

AWI obtained several extensions to complete the removal. Approximately eight months later, AWI returned possession of the property to Brea Imperial. However, AWI abandoned numerous pieces of contaminated equipment, large quantities of hazardous fluids and wastes and additional personal property. The condition of the property upon surrender by AWI required Brea Imperial to incur significant costs to "remediate" and delayed Brea Imperial's ability to relet the property.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
AWI contended that it timely and properly removed all items it was supposed to remove and that any alleged contamination was pre-existing and not AWI's responsibility per the subject's agreement. Defendant also denied the fraudulent conduct.

Result

The jury found in favor of plaintiff on each cause of action and awarded a cumulative total of $3,996,768 in compensatory damages. ($689,945 for breach of contract; $840,000 for trespass; $300,000 for negligence; $279,970 for fraud or deceit; $1,668,370 for conspiracy and prejudgment interest in the amount of $218,483.)

Other Information

FILING DATE: June 2, 2005.

Length

19 days


#101890

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390