This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Discrimination
Race and Gender Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Illegal Search and Seizure

Jane Smith, et al. v. City of Oakland, Richard Valerga

Published: Oct. 4, 2008 | Result Date: Jun. 27, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:06-cv-07171-MMC Settlement –  $2,000,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John L. Burris
(Law Offices of John L. Burris)

James B. Chanin
(Law Office of James B. Chanin)

Julie M. Houk


Defendant

Ines Vargas Fraenkel

Randolph W. Hall


Facts

In 2004 and 2005, 16 Vietnamese and Chinese women brought an action against the city of Oakland and police officer Richard Valerga. Plaintiffs alleged that Valerga would pull the women over without cause and have them sit in the front of his police car. Plaintiffs then claimed that he would either molest them by caressing their upper thighs or genitals, take photos with his cellular phone, and obtain their cell phone number so he could contact them. Plaintiffs also stated that Valerga's conduct would worsen if the women spoke little English and was unsophisticated. Valerga was convicted for his criminal conduct.

The plaintiffs brought an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, claiming violations of both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs asserted that they were victimized due to their race, ethnicity, and gender. They further claimed that different officers were aware of Valerga's conduct and that two of the plaintiffs stated that officers saw them in Valerga's car. They also asserted that Valerga was engaging in such conduct for many years.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants asserted that Valerga did not act inside the scope and course of his work when he engaged in this unlawful conduct and that the police department took reasonable action to protect the public from Valerga's conduct.

Damages

The plaintiffs demanded damages due to emotional distress and for violations of constitutional protections.

Result

A mediated settlement took place, resulting in payment of $2 million by the city to the plaintiffs.


#102051

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390