This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Labor Law
Labor Code Violation
Unfair Labor Practices

Century Fast Foods Inc. and William Lujan

Published: Feb. 13, 2016 | Result Date: Jan. 20, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 31-CA-116102 Bench Decision –  Ruling Affirmed

Court

NLRB


Attorneys

Respondent

Lonnie D. Giamela
(Fisher & Phillips LLP)


Facts

William Lujan was a former employee of Century Fast Foods Inc. at one of its Taco Bell restaurants. He signed an employment application that contained an Agreement to Arbitrate provision. Lujan brought a class action complaint against Century alleging wage-and-hour and other violations under California law. Century successfully moved to compel arbitration. The administrative law judge found that Century violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining and enforcing the agreement that required employees, as a condition of employment, to waive their rights to pursue class actions. Century challenged the judge's findings.

Contentions

CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS:
On April 24, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Ariel L. Sotolongo issued a ruling applying the Board's decisions in D. R. Horton, 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012), that the respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. The Board found that respondent violated the Act by maintaining and enforcing an agreement to arbitrate that required employees, as a condition of their employment, to waive their rights to pursue class or collective actions involving employment-related claims.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Century contended that the agreement to abide by the arbitration provision was not a required condition of employment and the caselaw relied upon by the judge was wrongly decided.

Result

The National Labor Relations Board affirmed the judge's findings and conclusions.


#102112

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390