This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Optometry and Ophthalmology Negligence

David E. Woodward Sr. v. United States of America

Published: Dec. 4, 2010 | Result Date: Oct. 15, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:10-cv-04671-HRL Settlement –  $250,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kim D. Staskus


Defendant

Jennifer S. Wang
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

In August 2004, 87-year-old David Woodward received medical treatment at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, and was diagnosed as being a glaucoma suspect. He visited the hospital several other times for care. Over a period of four and a half years thereafter, Woodward received no treatment from the VA Optometry Department for glaucoma.

Later, the hospital conducted an internal review of care given to 381 patients who were treated for glaucoma or were at risk for the disease. The investigation uncovered the fact that the hospital's optometrists had failed to have glaucoma patients examined by an ophthalmologist. As a result, the hospital informed eight patients, including Woodward, that they had suffered injuries that could have been prevented with an alternate course of treatment.

Woodward sued the hospital for negligence.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that he suffered from substantial vision losses resulting in legal blindness due to defendant's negligent medical treatment.

Injuries

Plaintiff suffered from loss of almost all peripheral vision and legal blindness, physical pain, anxiety, and depression. Plaintiff had no wage loss.

Result

The parties reached a settlement amounting to $250,000.


#102193

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390