This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Dependent Social Security

David A. Potop v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Dec. 11, 2010 | Result Date: Sep. 30, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:09-cv-02949-DMG-PJW Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary L. Tysch
(Law Offices of Gary L. Tysch)


Defendant

Ronald K. Alberts
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Shannon L. Victor


Facts

David Potop had a long-term disability (LTD) plan that stated that his benefits would be set-off by other income benefits, which the plan defined as "disability, retirement, or unemployment benefits required or provided for under any law of a government, such as Federal Social Security Act benefits." In addition, the plan stated that other income benefits also included benefits payable due to disability or retirement whether payable to Potop, his spouse, children, or dependents.

Potop sued Aetna Life Insurance Co. pursuant to ERISA, seeking payment of LTD benefits. Later, the parties reached a settlement as to monthly benefits, but the issue of whether Aetna could off-set Potop's benefits by the benefits Potop received from the Dept. of Social Security (DSS) for his children still remained.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that the plan did not have an off-set, DSS benefits did not constitute disability benefits, and that allowing otherwise contravened public policy.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that the plan contained an off-set, and claimed that an off-set of disability benefits by DSS benefits was supported by legal authority.

Result

The court found in favor of the defense, holding that the plan supported an offset of DSS benefits.

Other Information

SETTLEMENT OFFICER: Keith M. Parker.


#102208

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390