This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Trespass
Invasion of Privacy

David Andersen, Natasha Andersen v. Talala Mshuja, Vernon Williams, the Williams Trust, Huerta’s Tree Service

Published: Dec. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Jun. 15, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV163174 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Santa Cruz Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Luis V. Garcia

Eric C. Kastner
(Kastner Kim LLP)


Defendant

Shiva Tavakoli


Experts

Plaintiff

Bruce McGuire
(technical)

Curt Dunbar
(technical)

James E. Allen
(technical)

Defendant

Joseph McNeil
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiffs David and Natasha Andersen alleged that their neighbor, Talala Mshuja, and his brother, Vernon Williams, intentionally hired a tree trimming company to cut some redwood trees and vegetation on their adjacent property.

The Andersens sued Mshuja, Williams, the Williams Trust, and Huerta's Tree Service alleging trespass and invasion of privacy.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants intentionally trespassed onto their land, removing and de-limbing several of its trees and vegetations without their permission. Plaintiffs claimed that Mshuja had the work done while they were out of town so that they would not know about it. They further claimed that Mshuja began a campaign of harassment against them after the lawsuit was filed.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Mshuja and Williams claimed that Huerta's was 100 percent liable for all of the damages. Huerta's denied all allegations that they were liable for any of the alleged causes of action.

Settlement Discussions

Huerta's settled with plaintiffs for $75,000 a month prior to trial.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought damages for the cost of trees and vegetation restoration in the amount of $106,436.72, plus treble damages for a total of $319,310.16 for the damage to their property. They sought an additional $121,600 in attorney fees and $140,000 in emotional distress damages. Their total demand was $580,190.

Result

The jury found Huerta's 100 percent liable, and rendered a defense verdict for the remaining defendants.

Deliberation

four hours

Poll

12-0

Length

seven days


#102294

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390