This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Fraud
Intentional and Negligent Misrepresentation

Pari Michail v. Antoine Alti, Gracia Alti

Published: Dec. 31, 2010 | Result Date: Nov. 9, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC427525 Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Carlos A. Lloreda Jr.

Andrew L. Reback


Defendant

Carol A. Soon

Joseph A. Yanny
(Yanny & Smith)

H. Michael Yuen

Kim D. Ashley


Facts

In June 1986, plaintiff Pari Michail lent defendant Antoine Alti $70,000 to purchase a liquor store. In September 1995, plaintiff signed a note acknowledging that as of Sept. 1, 1995, Antoine Alti had fully repaid plaintiff all amounts owed.

In September 2009, intending to provide financial assistance to plaintiff, who was a friend and like a mother, Antoine Alti signed a note stating that he promised to give plaintiff $93,000.

Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging fraud, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, breach of contract, and conversion.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Antoine Alti and his wife Gracia owed her at least $70,000 plus interest. Plaintiff further contended that the note Antoine Alti signed in September 2009 was an acknowledgment of prior debts.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that defendant Antoine Alti signed the September 2009 note intending to give $93,000 to plaintiff as a gift in order to help her and that the September 2009 note was neither a binding contract nor an acknowledgment of prior debts. Defendants further contended that all amounts owed had been repaid in full and that plaintiff's lawsuit was untimely.

Damages

Plaintiff attempted to recover over $500,000.

Result

Judgment for defendants. After plaintiff had completed her presentation of the evidence, defendants made a motion for judgment. The judge granted defendants' motion, finding that plaintiff had failed to meet her burden on any of the causes of action. The judge further found that there was no fraud, no negligent misrepresentation, no unjust enrichment, and no conversion. In addition, the judge did not believe much of what plaintiff testified and found that another witness, Mrs. Davamandi, was intentionally attempting to mislead the court and the parties.

Other Information

Plaintiff's motion to tax costs. At the outset of trial, Mr. Lloreda became ill and was unable to complete the trial due to illness, and was replaced as lead counsel by Mr. Reback who completed the trial. FILING DATE: Dec. 8, 2009.


#102386

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390