Patterson v. Mahdavi
Published: Jun. 7, 2008 | Result Date: Feb. 8, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: GIC856690 Verdict – $400,000
Court
San Diego Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Michael E. Ripley
(Law Office of Michael E. Ripley)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Martin R. Owen
(technical)
Larry Teves
(technical)
Defendant
William Catlin
(technical)
Mark Wunch
(technical)
Facts
The plaintiff bought a house from defendant and discovered cracked slab one month later. The plaintiff also discovered patched interior walls and patched exterior stucco.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the defendant disclosed nothing; that the defendant knew of the slab crack, wall cracks and slab movement and uneven floor.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that he knew nothing, and that he had not patched cracks nor knew of slab cracks.
Settlement Discussions
The defendant offered $5,000.
Result
Verdict for $400,000.
Other Information
The defendant's motion for new trial was denied. The defendant's appeal is pending.
Deliberation
five hours
Poll
12-0 (for plaintiff on fraud, concealment, breach of contract, negligence), 9-3 (for plaintiff on damages)
Length
four days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390