This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Failure to Accommodate

Cheryl McElwain v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group Inc., Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc.

Published: Mar. 4, 2017 | Result Date: Dec. 21, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2015-00768685-CU-WT-CJC Verdict –  $307,762

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Helen U. Kim
(Helen Kim Law, APC)

J. Bernard Alexander III
(Alexander Morrison + Fehr LLP)


Defendant

Janine S. Simerly
(Miller Law Group)

Kerry McInerney Freeman
(Cozen O'Connor)


Facts

Plaintiff worked for defendants as a nurse manager at Kaiser Permanente Orange-Irvine Medical Center and an ambulatory nurse manager. Plaintiff filed suit against defendants following her termination.

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. was later dismissed from the lawsuit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that she requested to be transferred from her night shift as nurse manager to a day shift as an accommodation following hospitalization for a health condition related to severe reflux exacerbated by working the night shift. Rather than transferring her, defendants forced plaintiff to go on medical leave. During that time, plaintiff applied for many positions within Kaiser for which she was passed over. Eventually, she was assigned a day shift as an ambulatory nurse manager. However, plaintiff contended that this position was used by defendants as a way to force her out because they claimed she lacked the minimum qualifications, eventually terminating her after two negative performance evaluations.

She asserted causes of action against defendants for failure to engage in a good faith interactive process in violation of FEHA, discrimination in violation of FEHA, failure to accommodate in violation of FEHA, retaliation in violation of FEHA, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied plaintiff's allegations and argued that plaintiff did not have a disability. Even if she did have a disability, defendants argued that they tried to accommodate plaintiff but that she did not meet the minimum qualifications for her position.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff made a demand for $2.5 million and the defense offered $250,001.

Result

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, awarding her $307,762.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Jan. 28, 2015.


#103216

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390