This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Medical Malpractice
Negligence
Breast Reconstruction

Jennifer Twitchell, Richard Twitchell v. Zareh Vartivarian, M.D., and Does 1 through 40

Published: Apr. 1, 2017 | Result Date: Feb. 1, 2017 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC539662 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Pasadena


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven K. Beckett
(Law Office of Steven K. Beckett)


Defendant

Kent T. Brandmeyer
(Law & Brandmeyer LLP)


Facts

In July 2012, plaintiff Jennifer Twitchell, 46, was diagnosed with breast cancer. She elected to undergo bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. The surgery occurred on July 27, 2012. Defendant plastic surgeon Dr. Zareh Vartivarian performed a breast reconstruction by incising the plaintiff's pectoralis muscles and placing tissue expanders bilaterally.

Six weeks post-operatively, the tissue expander on the left side was discovered as flipped and therefore needing removal. When plaintiff concluded her chemotherapy six months later, she self-referred to another plastic surgeon who operated to remove the flipped tissue expander. That plastic surgeon discovered an over dissected pectoralis muscle from the previous surgery by Dr. Vartivarian, leading to the flipping of the tissue expander. The breast reconstruction process therefore had to start all over again with the second plastic surgeon.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Dr. Vartivarian breached standard of care in the technique that he used to place the tissue expanders. He over dissected the plaintiff's pectoralis muscle and neglected to properly suture the muscle down to the mastectomy skin flap. This resulted in the significant retraction of the pectoralis muscle and the flipping of the expander.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that Dr. Vartivarian performed the procedure technically the exact same way he had his entire carrier. He had performed immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander placement over 700 times and never had this complication. Additionally, there were alternative methods to perform this surgery, which would be within the standard of care.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $75,000. Defendant made no offer, no consent.

Specials in Evidence

$25,000

Damages

Plaintiff sought $250,000 in damages.

Injuries

The flipping of the tissue expander followed by additional surgeries in the breast reconstruction process caused plaintiff ongoing pain and suffering.

Result

The jury found in favor of the defense.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 19, 2014.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

12-0

Length

seven days


#103258

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390