This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Breach of Duty

Phu Van Nguyen, Son Nguyen v. City of Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach Police Department, Chief of Police Robert Handy, Surf City Nissan, Two Jinn Inc. dba Aladdin Bail Bonds, County of Orange, Doe Physician, Doe Pharmacist, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive

Published: Mar. 4, 2017 | Result Date: Nov. 4, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2016-00855645 Demurrer –  Defense

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Walter E. Teague III

Hoang Huy Tu
(The Tu Firm, APLC)


Defendant

S. Frank Harrell
(Lynberg & Watkins)

Pancy Lin


Facts

Phu Van Nguyen went to Surf City Nissan car dealership in Huntington Beach to view his newly purchased vehicle. He was arrested for vandalism after he mistakenly put his foot on the accelerator instead of the break, causing damage to the dealership's gate. Nguyen and his wife sued the dealership, the Huntington Police Department, the County of Orange, and others, asserting the following causes of action in their first amended complaint: negligence; intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligent infliction of emotional distress; loss of consortium; breach of duty; respondeat superior; and malpractice.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that Mr. Nguyen was wrongfully and aggressively detained despite the incident being a minor accident. Defendants wrongfully denied him his brain tumor medication while he was in jail for three days. As a result, Mr. Nguyen collapsed from dehydration and lack of medication while walking home after his release from jail.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The County of Orange contended in its demurrer that the complaint was uncertain because the individual causes of action failed to indicate to whom they were being asserted and because plaintiffs failed to identify the statute which allowed liability against it, a government entity.

Result

The court sustained the demurrer with 10 days leave to amend.

Other Information

FILING DATE: June 1, 2016.


#103686

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390