Perez v. Midland Funding
Published: Dec. 11, 2010 | Result Date: Oct. 11, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 10-CV-01916-LHK Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Mark A. Chavez
(Chavez & Gertler LLP)
Nance F. Becker
(Chavez & Gertler LLP)
William E. Kennedy
(Consumer Law Office of William E. Kennedy)
Bryan Kemnitzer
(Kemnitzer, Barron & Krieg LLP)
Defendant
Douglas C. Smith
(Smith Law Offices LLP)
Facts
Wells Fargo Bank assigned auto loans to a national credit management firm. The loans were in default after repossession of collateral vehicles. Later, plaintiff requested cancellation of deficiencies and deficiency judgments, which were worth millions of dollars, alleging that defects existed in post-repossession notices that the bank had given to borrowers.
Plaintiff sued the national credit management firm pursuant to the Rees Levering Motor Vehicle Sales & Finance Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Contentions
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that the National Bank Act and decision of the office of the Comptroller preempted requirements of the Rees Levering Act.
Result
The court dismissed the action with prejudice.
Other Information
Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390