This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Rees Levering Motor Vehicle Sales & Finance Act

Perez v. Midland Funding

Published: Dec. 11, 2010 | Result Date: Oct. 11, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 10-CV-01916-LHK Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mark A. Chavez
(Chavez & Gertler LLP)

Nance F. Becker
(Chavez & Gertler LLP)

Ben E. Dupre

William E. Kennedy
(Consumer Law Office of William E. Kennedy)

Bryan Kemnitzer
(Kemnitzer, Barron & Krieg LLP)


Defendant

Tara L. Martin

Douglas C. Smith
(Smith Law Offices LLP)


Facts

Wells Fargo Bank assigned auto loans to a national credit management firm. The loans were in default after repossession of collateral vehicles. Later, plaintiff requested cancellation of deficiencies and deficiency judgments, which were worth millions of dollars, alleging that defects existed in post-repossession notices that the bank had given to borrowers.

Plaintiff sued the national credit management firm pursuant to the Rees Levering Motor Vehicle Sales & Finance Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Contentions

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that the National Bank Act and decision of the office of the Comptroller preempted requirements of the Rees Levering Act.

Result

The court dismissed the action with prejudice.

Other Information

Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal.


#104130

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390