This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Design Immunity

Arnulfo Duran, an incompetent adult by his Guardian ad Litem, Emily Duran Briscoe v. State of California, Joseph Kenneth Redd

Published: Mar. 8, 2014 | Result Date: Aug. 1, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: MC019771 Settlement –  $1,000,000

Court

L.A. Superior Lancaster


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Donald G. Liddy
(Liddy Law Firm)

Yasmine A. Hussein
(Larson & Gaston LLP)


Defendant

Howard I. Chernin

Janine R. Fowler
(Caltrans/Legal Division- Dept of Transportation)


Facts

On Aug. 11, 2007, Arnulfo J. Duran, 58, was attempting to merge northbound onto the SR-14 freeway from the 10th St. west on-ramp in Palmdale, when he was rear-ended by defendant Joseph Kenneth Redd. Duran sustained fatal injuries in the collision.

Plaintiffs Emily Duran Briscoe and Arnulfo C. Duran are the adult children of the decedent.

Redd was dismissed prior to trial. The case proceeded against the State of California.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs argued that SR-14 north and the adjacent on-ramp were dangerous. Plaintiffs claimed that the California Department of Transportation, or CalTrans, failed to delineate traffic and there was insufficient length of acceleration lane to allow for safe merging onto the freeway. Plaintiffs further claimed that CalTrans knew of the dangerous condition, and had reasonable time to make the roadway safe, but failed to do so. Discovery revealed that a plan to install "channelizers," existed before the crash.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
CalTrans argued that the roadway was safe, and inattentive drivers caused the accident. CalTrans claimed that the decedent merged too soon and was driving too slowly.

CalTrans also claimed design immunity.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiffs demanded $1 million. Defendants offered $150,000.

Result

The case settled for $1 million during jury deliberations.

Other Information

The original Lancaster Superior Court indicated a bench trial would be held on the issue of design immunity. Upon re-assignment to Los Angeles Superior Central Court, the trial court ruled that loss of design immunity due to changed conditions was a question of fact for the jury. After closing argument and during deliberations, the case settled. INSURER: The State of California is self-insured. FILING DATE: Oct. 21, 2008.


#104313

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390