This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Banking
Breach of Contract
Wrongful Foreclosure

Ron Ward v. Wells Fargo, et al.

Published: Mar. 12, 2011 | Result Date: Feb. 11, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CISCV 167352 Bench Decision –  Preliminary Injunction

Court

Santa Cruz Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenneth S. Ingber


Defendant

Jarlath M. Curran II
(Severson & Werson APC)


Facts

In 2005, Ron Ward and his family obtained an $837,900 mortgage at six percent interest from Wells Fargo. When the housing market crashed three years later, the Wards stopped making payments at the bank's suggestion in order to qualify for a loan modification. The Wards made three payments to meet the terms of their loan modification agreement with Wells Fargo, when the bank sold their home at a foreclosure auction.

The Wards filed suit against Wells Fargo, alleging wrongful foreclosure and breach of contract.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The Wards contended that they submitted detailed information to the bank in order to receive a loan modification, but the bank repeatedly lost the documents and confused his file with another borrower's.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Wells Fargo contended the Wards did not qualify for a loan modification because their monthly income was less than their expenses.

Result

The court issued a preliminary injunction preventing Wells Fargo from evicting the Wards and selling the home.


#104520

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390