This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement

Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. ISPWest, et. al.,

Published: Jan. 6, 2007 | Result Date: Nov. 14, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV05-3296 Verdict –  Plaintiff.

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William A. Delgado
(DTO Law)

Paul J. Loh

Jason H. Wilson


Defendant

William E. Lloyd

Gregory J. Sater


Experts

Plaintiff

Howard Marylander
(technical)

Peter Kent
(technical)

Defendant

Sandra Cogan
(technical)

Ralph Sims
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Internet Specialties West, Inc. (ISWest), an internet service provider, sued defendant Milon DiGiorgio Enterprises, Inc. dba ISPWest (MDE) alleging that MDE's fictitious business name "ISPWest," for internet services, was causing confusion in the market between defendant and plaintiff's company.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff ISWest argued that it was entitled to damages and injunctive relief because: (1) its trade name and service mark "ISWest" was used in commerce prior to defendant's use of the mark "ISPWest"; (2) the "ISWest" mark was valid and protectable; and (3) defendant's use of the "ISPWest" mark was likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant MDE argued that it was not liable because: (i) it commenced using the ISPWest name prior to plaintiff's use of the name, ISWest; (ii) "ISWest" was not a valid or protectable mark; and (iii) there was no likelihood of confusion in the marketplace. MDE argued that ISWest's request for an injunction was barred by the equitable defense of laches.

Settlement Discussions

At the commencement of this lawsuit, ISWest offered to attend early settlement talks in the hopes of reaching a business resolution. Defendant rejected these offers for nearly a year. When it finally agreed to attend settlement talks and mediation, defendant subsequently rejected various reasonable proposals presented by ISWest.

Result

Jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, finding that defendant committed trademark infringement and unfair competition. The court issued a separate ruling on defendant's laches defense, which it rejected, finding that laches did not apply to the facts of this case. The court entered a permanent injunction on Nov. 14, 2006 enjoining defendant from utilizing names similar to ISWest, including ISPWest, and from otherwise unfairly competing with ISWest.

Other Information

The liability phase of the trial was tried to a jury, which found in favor of ISWest, and the laches issue was tried to the court, which also found in favor of ISWest.

Deliberation

five hours

Length

eight days


#104556

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390