This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Wrongful Foreclosure
Homeowner Bill of Rights

Jacqueline M. Rogers, an individual and borrower; Justin Alan Rogers, an individual v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Trustee Corps; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: May 21, 2016 | Result Date: Apr. 18, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:16-cv-01535-PA-GJS Bench Decision –  Dismissal in part

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tala Rezai
(Clark Hill LLP)

Erikson M. Davis


Defendant

David M. Liu
(Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLP)

John M. Sorich
(Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC)


Facts

Jacqueline Rogers and Justin Rogers sued JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, and Trustee Corps, for the alleged wrongful foreclosure of their home.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff Jacqueline obtained a loan secured by a deed of trust on the subject property located in Simi Valley. Following her default, defendants allegedly instituted nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. Plaintiffs attempted to pay the arrearages of just a few months, which defendants rejected. Defendants also allegedly refused to work with them in obtaining a loan modification. Ultimately, the property was sold at a foreclosure sale. Plaintiffs then brought this lawsuit asserting violation of California's Homeowner Bill of Rights, unfair business practices, wrongful foreclosure, breach of contract, violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and promissory estoppel.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. Defendant claimed Justin lacked standing to assert any of the claims because he was not a borrower under the loan. As to plaintiff Jacqueline, defendants argued she failed to allege her ability to tender and she admittedly defaulted on her loan, thereby causing her own damages. Defendant claimed all of the other claims fail as well.

Result

The district court dismissed the only federal claim (violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act) and thereafter declined to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state law claims. As such, the matter was remanded to the state court.


#104653

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390