This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Excessive Force
Fourth Amendment

Rosendo Palomo Gutierrez v. City of Yuba City, Yuba City Police Department, Officer Southward and Officer Slade

Published: Mar. 23, 2013 | Result Date: Feb. 1, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:2012at01415 Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jesse S. Ortiz III
(Ortiz Law Group PC)


Defendant

Bruce A. Kilday
(Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff LLP)

Serena M. Sanders


Facts

In December 2009, Yuba City Police Dept. officers responded to a call to the home of Rosendo Gutierrez after a neighbor reported that there were gunshots fired and a quarrel. Gutierrez informed the officers that he had been arguing with his wife, but denied that any gunshots had been fired. However, the police conducted a search of the home for weapons. An altercation ensued between the officers and Gutierrez. Although he was charged with misdemeanor resisting arrest, he was acquitted on June 23, 2010. Later, he filed suit for excessive force.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that the officers roughed him up by forcing him onto the ground and restraining him by sticking their knees into his body and head. In addition, Gutierrez argued that a three-year statute of limitations applied because trespass was involved, given that the officers allegedly entered the home absent Gutierrez's permission.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that dismissal was appropriate because plaintiff failed to bring the suit within the two-year statute of limitations. Defendant argued Gutierrez should have sued by June 23, 2013, two years subsequent to the acquittal.

Result

The court dismissed the lawsuit.


#104677

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390