This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Real Property Purchase Agreement

OSO Trabuco, LLC v. The Bixby Company

Published: Oct. 9, 2010 | Result Date: Feb. 21, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1200043344 Arbitration –  $2,378,650

Court

JAMS


Attorneys

Claimant

Stephen G. Hammers
(Hammers, PC)


Respondent

Thomas P. Aplin


Facts

In 2000, OSO Trabuco LLC entered into a "master agreement" with The Bixby Co. whereby Bixby agreed to entitle and sell several parcels of property owned by OSO in the City of Hercules. In addition, the contract stated that sales proceeds would be divided in stages to either OSO or Bixby. The agreement also included a right of assignment. The parties amended the contract in writing on three occasions.

In 2008, OSO filed a claim against Bixby, alleging breach of contract. Bixby cross-claimed for unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty.

Contentions

CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Claimant argued that respondent was required to pay the sales proceeds it was owed pursuant to the agreement. Claimant further contended that the parties had never agreed to become partners or to enter into a joint venture.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondent contended that the parties amended the contract orally which altered the relationship between the parties. Respondents claimed that the parties had a fiduciary relationship and entered into a joint venture based on their pursuit of a common goal and investments of capital in development.

Damages

Claimant sought $1.65 million, interest, costs, and fees. Respondent requested $7.5 million on the cross-claim.

Result

The arbitrator granted claimant $2,378,648 and denied respondent's claim.


#104718

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390