Evelyn Canonizado v. Niaz Tony Baig, Sameena Baig, Mohammad Rajput, Bruce Martin, Century 21 El Camino
Published: Oct. 9, 2010 | Result Date: Jun. 24, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: FG08419579 Verdict – Defense
Court
Alameda Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Rodel E. Rodis
(Law Office of Rodel E Rodis)
Defendant
Experts
Defendant
Harold A. Justman
(technical)
Facts
In January 2007, plaintiff Evelyn Canonizado, purchased vacant land, located in Fremont, from defendants Niaz Tony Baig and Sameena Baig for $3.6 million. The Baigs held a $732,000 carry-back note. Plaintiff purchased the land with the expectation that she would be developing 12 townhomes. Plaintiff alleged she was told permits had been issued and construction would begin within 60 days of the close of escrow.
Subsequent to her purchase, plaintiff alleged that she discovered that the permits had not been issued and that construction would not begin in 60 days. Permits were never obtained and construction never commenced.
The property was subsequently lost in foreclosure because plaintiff failed to make payments on the construction loan.
Plaintiff filed suit for negligent misrepresentation, concealment, intentional misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. Naiz Baig cross-claimed for the carry-back note.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendants Mohammed Rajput and Century 21 El Camino, her real estate agent, and the Baigs misrepresented the status of permits and plans for the 12-townhome development project and when construction was to begin.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Rajput, Bruce Martin, and Century 21 argued that all statements made prior to the close of escrow regarding the status of the permits and plans, were made based on information obtained directly from Niaz Baig. Defendants further contended that plaintiff obtained her own contractor to review and advise plaintiff on the status of the permits and plans.
Defendants also contended that the cause of plaintiff's damages was her failure to pay on her loan and refusal to pay designated professionals and not because of any alleged misrepresentations.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff's last demand was $610,000. Rajput, Martin, and Century 21 El Camino's last offer was $30,000. Naiz Baig demanded $732,000.
Damages
Plaintiff sought to recover her $610,000 down payment. Naiz Baig demanded $732,000 from plaintiff on the carry-back note.
Result
Defense verdict in favor of Niaz and Sameena Baig, Bruce Martin, Mohammad Rajput and Century 21 El Camino on the negligent misrepresentation, concealment, intentional misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty causes of action. The jury found that plaintiff's damages were the result of her failure to pay and move the development project forward, not as a result of any alleged misrepresentations. The Baigs also to recover damages against plaintiff based on the $732,000 carry-back note. Plaintiff is to recover damages against Sameena Baig on a $180,000 promissory note. Defendants are to recover costs against plaintiff.
Other Information
Motion by Niaz Baig for attorneys fees against plaintiff pursuant to contract is pending. The rescission cause of action was tried simultaneously; the court found for the seller.
Deliberation
1.5 days
Poll
10-2 (defense on intentional and negligent misrepresentation, concealment and breach of fiduciary duty)
Length
4.5 weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390