This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Multiple Automobile Accident
Rear-End Collision

Suzette Tate v. Vickie Jo Prendergast

Published: Oct. 9, 2010 | Result Date: Jul. 29, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2009-00122816 Verdict –  $300

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Marc Lazarus
(Russell & Lazarus APC)


Defendant

Jesse D. Marr
(The Law Offices of Jesse D. Marr)


Experts

Plaintiff

John C. Browne
(Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann LLP) (technical)

Francisco Tagle
(medical)

William R. Dobkin
(medical)

Defendant

SooHo Choi
(medical)

Facts

This matter arises out of a four-vehicle collision that occurred in stop-and-go traffic on the northbound I-405 on May 18, 2007. Vickie Jo Prendergast operated a 2000 Toyota 4-Runner. Plaintiff Suzette Tate, 40, operated a 2003 Lincoln Grand Marquis. Joshua Tasch operated a 1990 Lexus and Kara Lohrstorfer operated a 2006 Mercedes. Prendergast rear-ended Tate, forcing her into Tasch, who was then forced into Lohrstorfer.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Predergast was solely responsible for the collision.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant conceded that plaintiff's treatment with her primary care physician three days after the accident was reasonable. Defendant claimed that plaintiff's chiropractic care was unreasonable and unnecessary. The chiropractor admitted that he wrote his final report nine months after plaintiff's last visit but that his SOAP notes did not reflect any objective injury.

Defendant alleged that plaintiff's treatment with the orthopedic surgeon and neurosurgeon was not related to the accident and it began after plaintiff ran the half-marathon she denied running under oath.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded defendant's $100,000 policy limit at the onset of litigation, then issued an offer to compromise for $30,000. Defendant issued an offer to compromise for $20,001. Shortly before trial, plaintiff issued another offer to compromise for $14,999.

Specials in Evidence

$11,500 $80,000

Damages

Plaintiff asked the jury for $249,500 for her personal injuries.

Injuries

Plaintiff claimed to suffer from intense back pain. Plaintiff's experts testified that she suffered a lower back injury for which she required chiropractic care and epidural steroid injections. They also testified that the accident left plaintiff unable to engage in activities such as running a half-marathon. Plaintiff's neurosurgeon testified that she may need a surgical fusion within the next 10 years. Plaintiff claimed that she had run a half-marathon the year before the accident but that she was unable to run a half-marathon thereafter, because of the accident. According to the defense, plaintiff admitted that she did in fact run a post-accident half-marathon after being shown, on the witness stand, color photographs from the race.

Result

Prendergast was found 100 percent liable for the accident and plaintiff was awarded $300, which has since been paid. Defendant has filed a memorandum of costs for $12,703.

Other Information

Defendant was insured by Auto Club of Southern California.


#104733

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390