This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Broker Negligence
Investment Advice

Dolores Shira v. ML Stern & Co., LLC, Michael Rosenmayer

Published: Oct. 29, 2002 | Result Date: Aug. 27, 2002 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 0104005 Arbitration –  $25,000

Court

Case Not Filed


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James R. Ballard


Defendant

Raymond Prazen


Experts

Plaintiff

Arthur S. Leider
(Investors Arbitration Specialists LLC) (technical)

Facts

The claimant brought an action for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence against her former broker Michael
Rosenmayer and the brokerage house ML Stern & Co., LLC. The claimant, a senior citizen, alleged improper
trading in her securities account due to the purchase of high yield bonds.
The claimant alleged that she was told that the investments were safe, secure and had been fully and
adequately researched. The claimant alleged that the investments were, in fact, high risk and therefore not
suitable for her account.
The respondents denied making any misrepresentations and further denied that the purchases were unsuitable
for the account. The respondents asserted that the claimant was aware of the trades in her account and gave
authority for all trades in the account.
Additionally, the claimant had maintained an account with ML Stern for approximately seven years and
throughout that time had actively traded in high yield bonds with much success. The claimant had purchased
approximately 30 high yield bonds over the years and only two had failed to turn a profit. The two that had
failed to turn a profit were the subject of the arbitration.
The claimant contended that there had been improper trading in her securities account due to the purchase of
high yield bonds and that the respondent had made misrepresentations about the investments.
The claimant further contended that the investments were high risk investments and therefore not suitable for
her account.
The respondent denied making any representations and further denied that the
purchases were unsuitable for the account. The respondents contended that the claimant was
aware of the trades in her account and gave authority for all trades in the account. Additionally,
the claimant contended that the account performed well and suffered only two losses in
approximately 30 high yield positions.

Settlement Discussions

The respondents offered $30,000 prior to arbitration.

Damages

The claimant requested compensatory damages in the amount of $66,979, plus punitive damages in the amount of $200,000, expert witness fees of $3,000 and attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $20,000.

Other Information

The respondent ML Stern was ordered to pay $25,000 in compensatory damages. The respondent broker was dismissed with prejudice. The arbitration panel consisted of Harvey Flodin, Sally Williams and Arnold Packer.


#104838

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390