This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Discrimination
Fair Housing Act

United States of America v. The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, City of Lancaster, City of Palmdale

Published: Aug. 8, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 20, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-05471-SJO-SS Settlement –  $2,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Carrie Pagnucco

Kathryn Ladewski

Norrinda B. Hayat

Robyn-Mari Lyon Monteleone
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Defendant

Allison E. Burns

Mary C. Wickham
(Office of the Los Angeles County Counsel)

WM. Matthew Ditzhazy


Facts

The United States sued the cities of Lancaster and Palmdale and the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, which operated the federal Section 8 housing voucher program for the cities over alleged discriminatory housing practices.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The federal government contended that the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, the City of Lancaster, and the City of Palmdale engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminating against African-American residents living in Lancaster and Palmdale, including those who held federal Section 8 housing vouchers. Plaintiffs claimed the cities coordinated with the county and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to disproportionately subject African-American voucher holders to more intrusive and intimidating compliance checks and referred them for termination from the voucher program at higher rates than white voucher holders in those cities or elsewhere in the county. It contended that these actions violated the Fair Housing Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied that they engaged in discrimination or that they were liable for the conduct alleged by the government.

Result

The parties entered into a settlement agreement in which defendants agreed to abide by state and federal laws barring discrimination against Section 8 voucher participants based on race and other protected characteristics. Among the the terms, defendants also agreed to include implementing a written non-discrimination policy, providing mandatory education and training to relevant officials, employees and staff, and selecting fair housing liaisons. Additionally, the county will pay $1.975 million towards compensating those who may have been harmed by defendants' alleged discriminatory actions and reinstate approved voucher holders. It will also pay the U.S. $25,000 to vindicate the public interest.


#105146

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390