This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Slip and Fall

Jane Doe v. Roe Homeowners Association; Roe Lofts; Roe Building, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Sep. 19, 2015 | Result Date: Jun. 9, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC530247 Settlement –  $350,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew C. Bryman
(Bryman & Apelian)


Defendant

Lori D. Serota


Experts

Plaintiff

Brad P. Avrit P.E.
(technical)

Tye J. Ouzounian M.D.
(medical)

Defendant

Geoffrey M. Miller M.D.
(medical)

Mark S. Sanders Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

On April 26, 2012, plaintiff slipped and fell as she was descending a set of stairs at a high-end condominium building.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that the stairs were not conspicuous and that the lighting condition near and around the stairs was insufficient. The combination of the black marble stairs and dim lighting in that area resulted in a misstep by plaintiff.

Plaintiff located a witness who visited the premises before plaintiff's scene inspection and around the time of the incident who testified that the stairs were very dark. The stairs were within code regarding lighting at the time of plaintiff's scene inspection.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that plaintiff's incident did not occur the way she stated. Defendants claimed that the stairs were conspicuous and the lighting was appropriate. Defendants were aware that a misstep could occur in a situation where the steps were not conspicuous and that the consequence would be serious injury if not worse.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $750,000.

Specials in Evidence

$50,785 $15,000

Injuries

Plaintiff was diagnosed with a dislocated ankle and fracture to the distal fibula. Plaintiff had three surgical procedures.

Result

The case settled for $350,000.

Other Information

MEDIATOR: Floyd J. Siegal


#105292

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390