This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Wireless Patents

Autocell Laboratories Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Published: May 21, 2011 | Result Date: Mar. 16, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:2008cv00760 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Delaware


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Edward A. Pennington

Chadwick A. Jackson

Sid Pandit

John G. Day

Caroline Hong

Tiffany G. Lydon


Defendant

Karen J. Louden

Jack B. Blumenfeld
(Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP )

Gregory P. Stone
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)


Facts

Cisco Systems Inc. operated wireless networks.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Autocell Laboratories Inc. filed suit against Cisco, alleging patent infringement. Autocell contended its patents covered technology that had been incorporated into Cisco's wireless networks.

Result

The court granted Cisco's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement and denied Cisco's motion for summary judgment of invalidity.


#105421

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390