Billy Collins v. State of California, Navistar International Corp.
Published: Dec. 27, 2008 | Result Date: Sep. 11, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CV007121 Verdict – Defense
Court
San Joaquin Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Joseph W. Carcione Jr.
(Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Stucky, Markowitz & Carcione LLP)
Joshua S. Markowitz
(Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Stucky, Markowitz & Carcione LLP)
Defendant
Manuel C. Alvarado
(California Department of Transportation)
Claire C. Weglarz
(Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP)
Rhudolph Nolen Jr.
(Nolen Law Firm)
Experts
Plaintiff
Robert Lloyd Anderson
(technical)
Dean Jacobson
(technical)
Keith Friedman
(technical)
Harry J. Krueper Jr.
(technical)
Defendant
Ron Nelson
(technical)
Stephen M. Werner
(technical)
Robert L. Piziali
(technical)
Rose Ray
(technical)
Facts
In 1997, plaintiff Billy Collins, a 49-year-old truck driver, was operating a Navistar model 8200 tractor on Interstate 5 in the area of Shimizu Drive, Stockon when a minor individual threw concrete from a levee at the tractor, smashing through the windshield and hitting Collins in the head.
Collins sued numerous entities, most of which were dismissed voluntarily or through summary judgment.
The lawsuit proceeded to trial against the state of California (Caltrans) and Navistar Inc.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that the state was liable for defective and dangerous highway design because it did not surround the highway with a fence. Plaintiff further alleged products liability based on defective design against Navistar. He contended the rake angle of the tractor's windshield was too vertical; that the concrete rock would not have penetrated the windshield had it been sloped more horizontally.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The state of California claimed that the highway's condition was not dangerous and that it was not put on notice of any prior accidents at this particular location.
Navistar contended that the truck was not defective; that the minor individual's conduct was an unforeseeable event; and that the windshield's slope would not have prevented said unforeseeable event.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff demanded $22,500,000 (C.C.P. 998). Defendants made no offer.
Specials in Evidence
$3 million $1 million
Damages
Unspecified damages for pain and suffering.
Injuries
Plaintiff suffered brain damage and has since been in a vegetative state.
Result
The trial was bifurcated as to liability and damages. The jury returned a defense verdict on the issue of liability, finding that the highway was not dangerous and that the throwing of the concrete rock was not reasonably foreseeable. Thus, the issue of damages was not addressed.
Other Information
Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied. Defendants have filed motions for costs.
Deliberation
two days
Poll
9-3 (on California), 11-1 (on Navistar Inc.)
Length
nine weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390