This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement
Cybersquatting

Verizon Communications Inc. v. OnlineNIC

Published: Jan. 24, 2009 | Result Date: Dec. 24, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:08-cv-02832-JF Bench Decision –  $33,150,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sarah B. Deutsch

Howard A. Kroll
(Tucker Ellis LLP)

David J. Steele
(Tucker Ellis LLP)


Defendant

Perry J. Narancic


Facts

Plaintiff Verizon Communications Inc. maintained a website with registered trademarks. Defendant OnlineNIC registered 663 internet domain names. Verizon filed suit for trademark infringement.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Verizon contended that OnlineNIC was cybersquatting by registering domain names that were similar or identical to Verizon's protected trademark. Verizon argued that these registrations were made in bad faith, were unlawful, and done with the sole purpose of steering legitimate traffic away from Verizon onto OnlineNIC's sites.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
OnlineNIC did not appear to defendant the action because it did not have actual notice of the suit. The company is investigating the allegations set forth in the complaint and hopes to have the opportunity to address the merits of the case.

Result

The court found for Verizon in the amount of $50,000 for each "bad faith" registration by OnlineNIC.


#105736

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390