This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Constitutional Law
First Amendment
County Seal

Reverend Father Ian Elliott Davies, Reverend J. Edwin Bacon Jr., Shakeel Syed, Rabbi Harold M. Schulweis, Reverend Tera Little, Rabbi John Rosove, Reverend Peter Laarman, David N. Myers, Rabbi Amy Bernstein v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, William T. Fujioka

Published: Apr. 30, 2016 | Result Date: Apr. 6, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-00907-CAS-FFM Bench Decision –  Permanent Injunction

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Arwen R. Johnson
(King & Spalding LLP)

Benjamin B. Au
(Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Kimberly M. Singer

Linda M. Burrow
(Caldwell Leslie & Proctor PC)

Peter J. Eliasberg
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)


Defendant

Kenneth A. Maranga
(Maranga Morgenstern APLC)

Patricia E. Ellyatt

Timothy T. Coates
(Greines, Martin, Stein and Richland LLP)

Patricia M. Ford
(Morgenstern Law Group)

Frank J. Ozello


Facts

In January 2014, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a motion adding the Latin cross to the existing image of the San Gabriel Mission on the county's official seal. A group of taxpayers filed an action challenging the County Board of Supervisors.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that placing the cross on top of the seal's depiction of the San Gabriel Mission violated the No Aid Clause of article XVI, section 5 of the California constitution, the No Preference Clause of article I, section 4 of the California constitution, and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that adding the Latin cross was a reflection of the cultural and historical role that the Mission played in the development of the Los Angeles County region. Defendant contended that the depiction of the San Gabriel Mission with a cross on its roof was both physically and architecturally accurate, and that depicting the San Gabriel Mission with a cross properly identifies the structure as a mission. Defendant argued that no reasonable observer with knowledge of the history and influence of the missions in the Los Angeles region and the State of California would perceive the depiction of the Mission on the seal, along with the seal's many other images of historical significance, as an endorsement of Christianity.

Result

The court determined that the addition of the cross was unconstitutional and granted plaintiffs' motion for a permanent injunction.


#106127

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390