This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Negligence
Fraud

Eileen L. Green, individually and as trustee of the Eileen Green Investment Trust v. Coventry First, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Robert Mansour Hamzey Jr., an individual; Valley Forge Life Insurance Company, a business entity of unknown form; Sam Mansour, individually and as trustee of the Sam Mansour Insurance Trust, Dated 5/12/05;

Published: Jan. 28, 2012 | Result Date: Nov. 29, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 37-2010-00097972-CU-FR-CTL Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John P. Teague
(Smaha Law Group APC)


Defendant

Martin E. Rosen
(Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP)

Misty A. Murray
(Maynard Nexsen LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Eileen Green sued Coventry First and Valley Forge Life Insurance Co. for negligently and/or fraudulently removing her as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy insuring her deceased husband. Valley Forge paid the death benefit to the new beneficiary, an insurance trust with Green as a trustee.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Green claimed that Valley Forge was negligent for paying out the benefits to the wrong beneficiary.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Valley Forge argued that it had no reason to believe there was anything improper with respect to the change of beneficiary on the subject line of the insurance policy. It claimed it had fully discharged its duties under Insurance Code Section 10172 when it paid the death benefit to the named beneficiary and received no competing claim until after two years. Valley Forge also contended that insurers cannot be held liable under a theory of negligence as a matter of law.

Result

The court granted summary judgment for Valley Forge, agreeing that an insurer could not be held liable under a negligence theory as a matter of law. It also agreed that Valley Forge had discharged its duties under Insurance Code Section 10172 when it paid out the death benefit to the named beneficiary.


#106238

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390