This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction
Construction Negligence
Negligent Recommendation

Steven Dinstell, Sara L. Dinstell v. Black Diamond Landscape and Design, Basalite Concrete Products LLC

Published: Oct. 3, 2009 | Result Date: May 14, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVMSC 08-00267 Verdict –  $519,000

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey G. Nevin
(Nevin Law Firm PC)


Defendant

J. Randall Andrada

Colin C. Munro
(Carlson, Calladine & Peterson LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

David Doss
(technical)

Richard Holsinger
(technical)

Facts

In May 2005, Dr. Steven Dinstell and Sarah Dinstell met with representatives Basalite Concrete Products LLC (Basalite) regarding the installation of Basalite concrete blocks. The Dinstells asked the representatives to recommend a contractor who had experience installing the product for retaining walls. The representative suggested Black Diamond Landscape and Design (Black Diamond). Thereafter, the Dinstells contracted with Black Diamond. When the retaining walls failed, the Dinstells sued Basalite and Black Diamond.

The Dinstells settled with Black Diamond for $325,000 before trial.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs claimed that Black Diamond lacked a proper license to build retaining walls and that Basalite failed to investigate the qualifications of Black Diamond.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense denied the allegations and asserted that Black Diamond did not have problems in the past. Defendant also argued that there was no duty to the plaintiffs and that California did not recognize the tort of negligent recommendation.

Result

The jury found Basalite was negligent and awarded the plaintiffs $519,000.

Other Information

According to plaintiffs' counsel: The trial court decided that in this case, based on the plaintiff's evidence, that a common law duty of care did, as a matter of fact and law, exist. Plaintiffs' counsel believes that this is likely the first case in California, where a duty was found to exist, under a theory of negligent recommendation, outside medical referrals and causes arising under employment law.

Deliberation

four hours

Poll

10-2

Length

two weeks


#106291

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390