This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Legal Malpractice
Negligence
Damages

Outlandish, Inc. v. William G. Walker

Published: Jun. 14, 2000 | Result Date: Oct. 5, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 323904 Verdict –  $1,531,400

Judge

Nanette M. Warner

Court

Pima Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Shannon Giles

Jeffrey L. Willis


Defendant

Steven Weatherspoon

Edwin Gaines Jr.


Experts

Plaintiff

Merrie Brucks
(technical)

Robert K. Zimmer
(technical)

Defendant

Marc Fleischman
(technical)

Steve Lynn
(technical)

Facts

In February 1986, plaintiff Outlandish Inc. entered into a "Trademark and Trade Secret" licensing agreement with Good Earth Restaurant whereby it licensed from Good Earth the rights to use Good Earth's trademarks, trade name, recipes and the like for a restaurant in Tucson. The restaurant had previously operated as a franchise. In November 1995, Good Earth alleged that Outlandish had breached the agreement and immediately brought suit to enjoin it from using the licensed intellectual property and to declare the Licensing Agreement void. Outlandish retained defendant attorney William J. Walker to represent it in the suit. Good Earth moved for summary judgment. Walker filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, but did not respond to Good Earth's summary judgment motion. The court ruled in favor of Good Earth and enjoined Outlandish from using the Good Earth trademark and tradename. Outlandish was forced to close the restaurant on Dec. 31, 1996, after operating for approximately 17 years. Outlandish brought this action against Walker based on professional negligence theories of recovery. In the legal malpractice case, the court granted summary judgment on proximate cause for Outlandish. Thereafter, Walker stipulated that his actions fell below the standard of care. As a result, the jury trial addressed the issue of damages only.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $850,000. The defendant made a settlement offer of $500,000.

Damages

Plaintiff Outlandish claimed $1.2 million in damages for property lost due to the defendant's alleged legal malpractice.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and ten months after the case was filed.

Deliberation

two hours

Length

five days


#106867

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390