Rianda v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area
Published: Nov. 12, 2005 | Result Date: Sep. 16, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 15016 Verdict – $0
Judge
Court
Mono Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
John P. Nahra
(Baker Keener & Nahra LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Robert Schaffer
(technical)
Facts
Plaintiff Rianda, a homeowner, brought an action against defendant Mammoth Mountain Ski Area (MMSA) for breach of contract, nuisance, negligence, and negligent misrepresentation.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that MMSA breached a written contract between 1998 and 2004 by its improper use of a parking lot in front of the plaintiff's home, which included construction staging and storage of construction materials during the summer months. MMSA failed to maintain certain landscaping in front of the plaintiff's home, also in breach of the contract. The plaintiff further contended that MMSA's activities were negligent and constituted a private nuisance and negligent misrepresentation. The plaintiff alleged that the value of the property at the time it was sold in 2004 had diminished by an amount between $140,000 and $190,000. DEFENDANT
The plaintiff contended that MMSA breached a written contract between 1998 and 2004 by its improper use of a parking lot in front of the plaintiff's home, which included construction staging and storage of construction materials during the summer months. MMSA failed to maintain certain landscaping in front of the plaintiff's home, also in breach of the contract. The plaintiff further contended that MMSA's activities were negligent and constituted a private nuisance and negligent misrepresentation. The plaintiff alleged that the value of the property at the time it was sold in 2004 had diminished by an amount between $140,000 and $190,000. DEFENDANT CONTENTIONS:
The defendant denied that it was responsible for any damage as a result of the landscaping. It also denied that its activities or those of anyone using the parking lot constituted a nuisance or that any activities were negligent.
Result
At the end of the trial, the causes of action for negligence and negligent misrepresentation were dismissed. The jury returned a defense verdict on the remaining causes of action.
Deliberation
4.5 hours
Poll
12-0
Length
five days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390