This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Compensations, Benefits
Wage and Hour

Nicole Dorsette, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public v. TA Operating, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dba Travelcenters of America, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Mar. 26, 2011 | Result Date: Jul. 28, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:09-cv-01350-PA -RZ Settlement –  $900,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven L. Miller

Kenneth S. Gaines
(Gaines & Gaines APLC)

Daniel F. Gaines
(Gaines & Gaines APLC)


Defendant

Jack S. Sholkoff
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC )

Andrew L. Alexis

Cheryl L. Schreck
(Fisher & Phillips LLP)


Facts

Nicole Dorsette was an employee of TA Operating LLC.

Dorsette filed a class action suit against TA Operating, alleging violations of the California Labor Code.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The class contended that TA Operating made unlawful deductions from employees' wages, failing to pay wages on demand without discount, and forced employees to patronize the company. The class further alleged that TA Operating automatically charged employees $1 per week without consent for employees to have unlimited fountain beverages from company machines, additionally charging employees if they did not provide their own cups. The class further contended that TA Operating failed to properly compute overtime paid to employees on commission wages.

Additional claims included failure to issue pay cards to employees in compliance with Labor Code section 212, and claims for derivative penalties.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
TA Operating denied the allegations.

Damages

The class sought compensatory damages for check cashing fees, illegal wage deductions, as well as penalties, injunctive relief, and attorney fees and costs.

Result

The parties reached a settlement for $900,000.


#108019

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390