Weyman H. Cox II v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Published: Mar. 19, 2011 | Result Date: Jan. 14, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:08-cv-01353-LAB -WVG Verdict – Defense
Court
USDC Southern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Michael B. Horrow
(Donahue & Horrow LLP)
Defendant
Daniel W. Maguire
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)
Keiko J. Kojima
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Paul Tornambe
(medical)
John Sargent
(technical)
Vincent Granieri
(technical)
Defendant
Alfredo A. Sadun M.D.
(medical)
Facts
Weyman Cox purchased an insurance policy from Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. in 1992, which provided lifetime benefits in the case of total disability. The monthly payment differed following the first three years, depending on whether the disability was due to injury or sickness. In 1994, Cox had a retinal detachment in his left eye, which she stated resulted from a snowmobiling accident, and in 1998 he reported a retinal detachment in his right eye from golfing. In December 2004, Cox claimed he could no longer perform his occupation after he developed cataracts in both eyes. Paul Revere paid the claim as a sickness, giving Cox full benefits until April 2008, followed by a reduction of benefits thereafter.
Cox filed suit against Paul Revere, alleging breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Cox contended that his injury was due to injury by the 1994 accidents.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Paul Revere alleged Cox's disability was due to sickness, and that the retinal detachment in Cox's left eye was spontaneous, not from snowmobiling.
Damages
Cox sought an additional $6,480 per month following the three-year initial payment period.
Result
The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.
Deliberation
four hours
Poll
7-0
Length
four days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390