This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Breach of Contract
Breach of Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Weyman H. Cox II v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Published: Mar. 19, 2011 | Result Date: Jan. 14, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:08-cv-01353-LAB -WVG Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael B. Horrow
(Donahue & Horrow LLP)


Defendant

Daniel W. Maguire
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)

Keiko J. Kojima
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Paul Tornambe
(medical)

John Sargent
(technical)

Vincent Granieri
(technical)

Defendant

Alfredo A. Sadun M.D.
(medical)

Facts

Weyman Cox purchased an insurance policy from Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. in 1992, which provided lifetime benefits in the case of total disability. The monthly payment differed following the first three years, depending on whether the disability was due to injury or sickness. In 1994, Cox had a retinal detachment in his left eye, which she stated resulted from a snowmobiling accident, and in 1998 he reported a retinal detachment in his right eye from golfing. In December 2004, Cox claimed he could no longer perform his occupation after he developed cataracts in both eyes. Paul Revere paid the claim as a sickness, giving Cox full benefits until April 2008, followed by a reduction of benefits thereafter.

Cox filed suit against Paul Revere, alleging breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Cox contended that his injury was due to injury by the 1994 accidents.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Paul Revere alleged Cox's disability was due to sickness, and that the retinal detachment in Cox's left eye was spontaneous, not from snowmobiling.

Damages

Cox sought an additional $6,480 per month following the three-year initial payment period.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.

Deliberation

four hours

Poll

7-0

Length

four days


#108023

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390