This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Writ of Mandate

Emergency Shelter Coalition v. City of San Clemente, City Council of City of San Clemente, Planning Commission of City of San Clemente, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

Published: Jul. 30, 2016 | Result Date: Jul. 1, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2014-00758880-CU-WM-CJC Bench Decision –  Petition Granted

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Petitioner

Nora N. Salem
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)

Michael A. Schachter
(Keller Anderle LLP)

John P. Rosenberg
(Law Offices of John P. Rosenberg PLC)

Kamran Vakili

Brian Z. Bark

Brett J. Williamson
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)

Lisa M. Foutch

Ashley M. Pavel

Jennifer L. Keller
(Keller Anderle LLP)

Edmond M. Connor
(Connor Fletcher & Hedenkamp)

Andra B. Greene
(Irell & Manella LLP)


Defendant

Jeffrey V. Dunn
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP)

Cristina L. Talley
(Best Best & Krieger LLP)


Facts

The Emergency Shelter Coalition filed a petition for writ of mandate against the City of San Clemente, the City Council and the Planning Commission, seeking to vacate the city's emergency shelter ordinance, and compel the city to adopt an ordinance that facilitates the development of emergency shelters.

Contentions

PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS:
The Legislature and Governor passed legislation to facilitate the development of emergency shelters, and plaintiff filed this writ petition seeking to compel the city to adopt an ordinance that would implement that legislation. Plaintiff alleged that this legislation required the city to enact an ordinance that would allow for the creation of emergency shelters without the need for conditional use permits or discretionary approvals by the city. Plaintiff also alleged that a shelter operator should be able to, as a matter of right, identify a property suitable for use as a shelter and then purchase or lease that property. Accordingly, plaintiff alleged that the city's ordinance was unlawful because it included only city-owned properties, and the availability of such properties was subject to discretionary approvals by the city.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The city generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The trial court granted plaintiff's writ petition and ordered the city to, inter alia, vacate and set aside the city's emergency shelter ordinance and any actions taken in conformance with it, amend the city's zoning code to establish at least one zone in which emergency shelters will be permitted by right without the need for any discretionary approvals, and to comply with its duty under Government Code Section 65588(e) to adopt and submit an updated housing element.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Dec. 1, 2014.


#108395

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390