This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Constitutional Law
Due Process Violation
Writ of Habeas Corpus

Jose Espinoza v. S. Sherman, Warden

Published: Jul. 23, 2016 | Result Date: Jul. 7, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:15-cv-01594-AWI-JLT Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Petitioner

Pro Per


Respondent

Kamala D. Harris

Julie A. Malone

Pamela Hooley
(Office of the Attorney General)


Facts

Petitioner, an inmate serving a life sentence, got into a fight with another inmate regarding gambling. Petitioner was found guilty of violating California Code of Regulations, title 15, section 3005(a) for behavior that might lead to violence. He was assessed a 30 day loss of credit for the violation, but the credits were later restored. He later filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court challenging the state courts' denial of habeas relief.

Contentions

PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS:
Petitioner alleged that his due process rights were violated during the adjudication of his disciplinary action.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondent contended that the petition should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the credits petitioner lost as a result of the rules violation were restored. Therefore, a successful petition would not speed his release, rendering his claims not cognizable.

Result

The court granted respondent's motion to dismiss, with prejudice.


#108410

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390